Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
155 bytes removed ,  14:57, June 20, 2011
m
→‎Changes explained: rm ref from talk-page
Line 169: Line 169:  
*''The [[King James Version]] typically translated it as "behold", but that is archaic today.'' Already mentioned in the section on the KJV.
 
*''The [[King James Version]] typically translated it as "behold", but that is archaic today.'' Already mentioned in the section on the KJV.
   −
*''Other anachronistic translations include "lo" or "see", but that merely translates how the word calls attention to what follows from it.<ref>Danker, Frederick W.: ''A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature''. 3d ed. University of Chicago Press.</ref>'' That's just the wrong way around: ''See!'' is a literal translation, and therefore calls attention to what follows....
+
*''Other anachronistic translations include "lo" or "see", but that merely translates how the word calls attention to what follows from it.'' That's just the wrong way around: ''See!'' is a literal translation, and therefore calls attention to what follows....
    
So, I made a view changes and moved some of the text further down.
 
So, I made a view changes and moved some of the text further down.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu