1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 181:
Line 181: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 23:24, April 5, 2007
, 23:24, April 5, 2007→This "namespace" is a joke. It claimed people to be scholars who weren't
: The namespace means its not a real article and lets people bicker back and foreth without the threat of getting banned. Citations are not needed (unless you presume to go clean up the other Conservapedia namespace articles that lack citations). What are your credentials anyways? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:16, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
: The namespace means its not a real article and lets people bicker back and foreth without the threat of getting banned. Citations are not needed (unless you presume to go clean up the other Conservapedia namespace articles that lack citations). What are your credentials anyways? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:16, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
: *sigh* Ask first, act then. It's not quantum physics. "Namespace" = a sort of container, filled with articles. All regular articles are in the "Main" namespace (for example, [[Theory of evolution]] is in the main namespace). Article Talk pages (like [[Talk:Theory of evolution]]) are in the "Talk" namespace. Same goes for pages in the "Help" namespace (all articles starting with "Help:...") or the "Conservapedia" namespace (like this "article").
:Articles in the "Conservapedia" namespace are NOT regular articles. All debates are in it, along with a few special pages about Conservapedia itself. This "article" was moved from the "Main" namespace to the "Conservapedia" namespace - most likely BECAUSE it's not a normal article and more of a debate.
:As you may have noticed, debates fall a bit out of the normal rules - not everything must be sourced (althouth it helps). Original research and argumentation is naturally a part of a debate, so it's completely counter-intuitive to suddenly "clean up" things - you're destroying a debate archive. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:24, 5 April 2007 (EDT)