Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archaeopteryx (view source)

Revision as of 14:23, June 22, 2011

431 bytes added ,  14:23, June 22, 2011
improved
Line 79: Line 79:     
The [[Nobel Prize]] committee punished Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] for exposing this fraud by passing him over and giving its award to his underling for work that Hoyle was the undisputed leader on.
 
The [[Nobel Prize]] committee punished Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] for exposing this fraud by passing him over and giving its award to his underling for work that Hoyle was the undisputed leader on.
 +
 +
After Hoyle was punished, other scientists predictably claimed that the fossils were not forgeries<ref>Charig et al. 1986. Archaeopteryx is not a forgery. Science 232: 622-626</ref>. Answers in Genesis has found the ''Archaeopteryx'' to be so flawed with respect to the theory of evolution that it does not rely on the evidence that it is a fraud.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/topic/arguments-we-dont-use</ref>
    
===Not a transitional===
 
===Not a transitional===
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,342

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/881772"

Navigation menu