Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2,243: Line 2,243:     
:::::::August, I have an open mind about this.  I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.  But please explain if you think that is in error.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:27, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::August, I have an open mind about this.  I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.  But please explain if you think that is in error.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:27, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
I hope we can agree on the function ''F<sub>theo</sub>'' - it should be uncontroversial:
 +
 +
*one layer exists from 1 - 2 - 4 - 8 words, i.e., 2<sup>0</sup>, 2<sup>1</sup>,2<sup>2</sup> and 2<sup>3</sup>
 +
*the partial sums are 1 - 3 - 7 - 15, i.e., 2<sup>1</sup>-1, 2<sup>2</sup>-1, 2<sup>3</sup>-1, and 2<sup>4</sup>-1
 +
*so, with the turn of the n-th century, there should be 2<sup>n+1</sup>-1 words
 +
*for K layers, the number is K * (2<sup>n+1</sup>-1). Each layer has 15 words, thus, if there are '''N''' feasible words, the number of layers is '''N'''/15
 +
*now adjust for years instead of centuries, and don't start with the first, but with the 17th, and you get the formula <math>F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}</math><math>(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)</math>.
 +
 +
'''@jcw: ''' ''Another editor has attempted a similar argument above, but without success.'' I read the sections above, and I ''was'' convinced by the argument.
 +
 +
'''@Aschlafly:''' ''I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.''  The effects of the miscount ([[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words#PERFECTION: 20-40-80-160 BY CENTURY]]) have shown that you are able to match any  pattern you were looking for.
 +
 +
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:11, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
    
== Americanadians ==
 
== Americanadians ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu