Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,094
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:15, April 6, 2007
, 00:15, April 6, 2007→Wikipedia vs. Conservapedia: I disagree
==Wikipedia vs. Conservapedia==
==Wikipedia vs. Conservapedia==
BTW, I'm a far right wing conservative writing this. Although some of your points are correct, and Wikipedia still has a few problems with POV, it's little compared to Conservapedia's blatant bias--and preference to "the majority of American's opintions" over all other data. What the opinion of American's is isn't really the main concern of a subject--if it was, I guess here would be a good place to go, if they want to find more solid information--even about such silly things as dogs--they might as well check out wikipedia, or citizendium. Even some of the controversial subjects, where Wikipedia is very anti conservative (sometimes to the point of dishonest) there articles are more informative then yours!--[[User:Jacklovedlucy|Jacklovedlucy]] 19:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
BTW, I'm a far right wing conservative writing this. Although some of your points are correct, and Wikipedia still has a few problems with POV, it's little compared to Conservapedia's blatant bias--and preference to "the majority of American's opintions" over all other data. What the opinion of American's is isn't really the main concern of a subject--if it was, I guess here would be a good place to go, if they want to find more solid information--even about such silly things as dogs--they might as well check out wikipedia, or citizendium. Even some of the controversial subjects, where Wikipedia is very anti conservative (sometimes to the point of dishonest) there articles are more informative then yours!--[[User:Jacklovedlucy|Jacklovedlucy]] 19:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:I disagree; Wikipedia requires conservative views and opinions to fit the mold of what liberals define as conservaitve views and opinions; and if an editor doesn't comply, they're soon off to the wikigulag. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:15, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
== Porn again ==
== Porn again ==