Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
16 bytes added ,  21:20, June 23, 2011
Line 33: Line 33:  
:I've fixed the reference to include author/title/ISBN - something you could very easily have done. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on what it says on this point, but your opinion that it's 'dubious' isn't a reason to remove the information. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:31, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
 
:I've fixed the reference to include author/title/ISBN - something you could very easily have done. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on what it says on this point, but your opinion that it's 'dubious' isn't a reason to remove the information. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:31, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
   −
:: You're right, I could have changed it very easily. But I didn't want to take the responsibility because I also haven't read the book, so I wasn't sure I would have been referencing material that actually think is worthy of citation. I was half hoping the author of this page who probably read the book could elaborate on it. If you're confident enough to make the change though, then that's fine and I apologise.  
+
:: You're right, I could have changed it very easily. But I didn't want to take the responsibility because I also haven't read the book, so I wasn't sure I would have been referencing material that I think is worthy of citation. I was half hoping the author of this page who probably read the book could elaborate on it (Give pages and so on). If you're confident enough to make the change though, then that's fine and I apologise.  
    
::Also, regarding devolution, I think that resistance to antibiotics is the opposite of devolution as it is a beneficial adaptation to its environment. If you think I don't have grounds to make the claim then that's fine, as I said if anyone has any objections that I'll at least leave it open for debate.[[User:SecularConservative|SecularConservative]] 22:18, 23 June 2011 (BST)
 
::Also, regarding devolution, I think that resistance to antibiotics is the opposite of devolution as it is a beneficial adaptation to its environment. If you think I don't have grounds to make the claim then that's fine, as I said if anyone has any objections that I'll at least leave it open for debate.[[User:SecularConservative|SecularConservative]] 22:18, 23 June 2011 (BST)

Navigation menu