Changes

It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>

It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>

It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is no substantial evidence for [[macroevolution|macroevolutionary]] change regarding this species.

It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack substantial evidence for [[macroevolution|macroevolutionary]] change regarding this species.

Two of the Australopithecii would have been taken in [[Noah's Ark]]. Australopithecus had five sub-species: A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. garhi.

Two of the Australopithecii would have been taken in [[Noah's Ark]]. Australopithecus had five sub-species: A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. garhi.