176
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 23:43, June 24, 2011
, 23:43, June 24, 2011no edit summary
Evolution is not a religious idea.
Evolution is not a religious idea.
--[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 20:13, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
--[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 20:13, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
:Several of your arguments are critically flawed.
:1. Because life was divinely created, even if evolution did occur, it would be affected by the divine grace of God, and not just random chance.
:3. Information is basically stored knowledge, such as God storing the exact series of proteins needed for an organism to survive as DNA.
:4. Because of natural selection, specialization could never occur, as hypothetical "transitional animals" could never out compete a specialized animal. Thus, the number of species should only decrease as time goes on.
:6. A snowflake is not a self-replicating series of biochemical reactions, so it is not an accurate comparison. The human body contains no vestigial organs, even organs previously though of as "useless" have been discovered to have important functions. The human body no redundancy, unless said redundancy is extremely important or advantageous for survival, such as having two eyes or two lungs. random chance could never produce such a perfect system, the only logical explanation is that there was some kind of divine plan for us.
:9. Those fossils barely contain proof of an organism, let alone a true transitional species. We can't even be sure that they are legitimate fossils, and not just hoaxes propagated by the organizations that claim to study evolutionary "science".
:10. Although a slight oversimplification, the "theory" of evolution does in fact state that over a series of generations, humans did evolve from worms. In addition, because evolution is caused by mutations, shouldn't millions of years of random mutations eventually lead to evolution? Even if only neutral or positive mutations remained in the gene pool, eventually, these ancient species should look at least slightly different.
:11. And why do only (conservative) humans have true morality and altruism? Chemistry has no emotions, and the expression of true, human empathy can only come from a god-fearing Christian.
:12. Such as creation theory, which is more logical and explains the origin of life, among other things, much better.
:13. Those disciplines study phenomena God created in the first place. Nothing about medicine relies on evolution, even the study of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic resistance occurs because of the transfer of already existing antibiotic resistance plasmids between bacteria.
:14. It's impossible to preform experiments that test evolution, and any attempts have either failed or have been critically flawed. Thus, evolution is not operational science, or really science at all.
:15. Evolution requires more faith than any religion I have ever encountered, and it is certainly taught religously by the few teachers who haven't realized how critically flawed it is.
:Don't feel bad, if there is one thing evolutionists are good at or understand, its how to deceive and lie like any liberal. Critical thinking is important to any academic study, so you can't accept something as true unless you are willing to appreciate that you might not be learning the truth, as liberals are willing to lie for their own agenda. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 19:43, 24 June 2011 (EDT)