How is this relevant to 'Liberalism'? Isn't this kind of quoting the bible just selfserving? Because it doesn't serve the article. [[User:Order]] 6 April 10:25 (AEST)
How is this relevant to 'Liberalism'? Isn't this kind of quoting the bible just selfserving? Because it doesn't serve the article. [[User:Order]] 6 April 10:25 (AEST)
+
+
:I think we have it properly disclaimed in the article now, that the secular meaning is a perversion from its etympolical roots and is really quit the opposite of what the word is intended to convey. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:39, 5 April 2007 (EDT)