Changes

:::This one should do [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&diff=58158&oldid=58154] [[User:Order]] 5 April, 2:20 (AEST)

:::This one should do [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&diff=58158&oldid=58154] [[User:Order]] 5 April, 2:20 (AEST)

::::ohhh, ok.  This is a reference to the Politcal Spectrum Theory once again. People are not born "moderate" or  "center-right" as they are Jewish for example, or Black, male or female, or as some would theorize "born homosexual".  We can't pass off theories like "leftism" for example, as being doctrinal or definitive of anything.  It means different things to different people and different cultures at different places at different times.  It's all subjective, and not very definitive or anything.  [[User:RobS|RobS]]

::::ohhh, ok.  This is a reference to the Politcal Spectrum Theory once again. People are not born "moderate" or  "center-right" as they are Jewish for example, or Black, male or female, or as some would theorize "born homosexual".  We can't pass off theories like "leftism" for example, as being doctrinal or definitive of anything.  It means different things to different people and different cultures at different places at different times.  It's all subjective, and not very definitive or anything.  [[User:RobS|RobS]]

 

** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.

** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.

** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.

** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.