176
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: + +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 23:15, June 28, 2011
, 23:15, June 28, 2011→This is a farce, you are embarrassing yourself
I suggest rereading Conservapedia's [[evolution]] and [[atheism]] articles over and over until they sink in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:52, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
I suggest rereading Conservapedia's [[evolution]] and [[atheism]] articles over and over until they sink in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:52, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
:The Evolution article is seriously flawed and no, I'm not an Atheist. I actually do believe in Theistic Evolution, but I cant provide any verifiable evidence to support that idea so I dont advance it as fact. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 18:46, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
:The Evolution article is seriously flawed and no, I'm not an Atheist. I actually do believe in Theistic Evolution, but I cant provide any verifiable evidence to support that idea so I dont advance it as fact. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 18:46, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
::Theistic Evolution is just as valid a theory as Creation, as they both explain the method by which humans were divinely created. The only difference is that Theistic Evolution is directly refuted by The Bible. As someone who has studied biology in both private and academic settings, the evolution article is perfectly valid from a logical viewpoint and brings more than reasonable doubt to the "scientific" theory of evolution. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 19:15, 28 June 2011 (EDT)