Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 106: Line 106:     
::Theistic Evolution is just as valid a theory as Creation, as they both explain the method by which humans were divinely created. The only difference is that Theistic Evolution is directly refuted by The Bible. As someone who has studied biology in both private and academic settings, the evolution article is perfectly valid from a logical viewpoint and brings more than reasonable doubt to the "scientific" theory of evolution. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 19:15, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
 
::Theistic Evolution is just as valid a theory as Creation, as they both explain the method by which humans were divinely created. The only difference is that Theistic Evolution is directly refuted by The Bible. As someone who has studied biology in both private and academic settings, the evolution article is perfectly valid from a logical viewpoint and brings more than reasonable doubt to the "scientific" theory of evolution. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 19:15, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
−
:::It's unbiblical (poor Bible exegesis) and is just jerry-rigged evolution. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:17, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
+
:::Theistic evolution is  unbiblical (poor Bible exegesis) and is just jerry-rigged evolution.[http://creation.com/10-dangers-of-theistic-evolution] [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:17, 28 June 2011 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,104

edits

Navigation menu