1,066
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − * MIT computer scientist Scott Aaronson is so confident that the proof is wrong, he’s offered Deolalikar an additional $200,000 if he’s awarded the $1,000,000 Clay Millennium Prize for the proof.<ref>http://www.geekosystem.com/p-np-proof-vinay-deolalikar/</ref>+
Yeah, that needs context.
* Before consideration, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute (or such other form as the SAB shall determine qualifies), and it must also have general acceptance in the mathematics community two years after. [http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Rules_etc/ Clay Mathematics Institute]
* Before consideration, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute (or such other form as the SAB shall determine qualifies), and it must also have general acceptance in the mathematics community two years after. [http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Rules_etc/ Clay Mathematics Institute]
In August 2010, [[Vinay Deolalikar]] gave a proposed proof. MIT computer scientist Scott Aaronson was so confident that the proof is wrong, he’s offered Deolalikar an additional $200,000 if he’s awarded the $1,000,000 Clay Millennium Prize for the proof.<ref>http://www.geekosystem.com/p-np-proof-vinay-deolalikar/</ref>. The current consensus is that Deolalikar's proof does not work.
== References ==
== References ==