SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
Debate:Which is more important, economic or social conservatism? (view source)
Revision as of 14:21, July 5, 2011
, 14:21, July 5, 2011no edit summary
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
:Social conservatism is a way of restricting freedom, which this site seems to vehemently oppose. Economic conservatism is reasonable during times of expansion, but as the aftermath of the [[Great Depression]] proved, the best way to get out of a hole is to fill it with money. That's my two cents. [[User:AlanR|AlanR]] 08:26, 28 February 2010 (EST)
:Social conservatism is a way of restricting freedom, which this site seems to vehemently oppose. Economic conservatism is reasonable during times of expansion, but as the aftermath of the [[Great Depression]] proved, the best way to get out of a hole is to fill it with money. That's my two cents. [[User:AlanR|AlanR]] 08:26, 28 February 2010 (EST)
One semi-related question: would you agree that it is easier to understand social issues than it is to understand economic issues? Therefore those with no opinion is higher for economic issues than for social issues, and hence it is 'more important' to be an economic conservative as it is less common. And a question on social conservatism (because I can't work out how to add debate topics, nor find a place which tells me how to): What is the typical conservative view of those who refuse to consider or think about moral questions (and hence have no opinion)? - JamesCA, 5th July 2011