3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Abortion (view source)
Revision as of 04:37, July 10, 2011
, 04:37, July 10, 2011no edit summary
To strengthen the credibility of this wiki, I will show the factual inaccuracies because I'm too stupid to figure out how to edit the actual article to fix it myself, or the article's locked... I'm not sure and don't care if this is due to ignorance on Conservapedia's part or Wikipedia's frequent process known as "updating," but I hope these are fixed. Unfortunately, every single point had flaws.
To strengthen the credibility of this wiki, I will show the factual inaccuracies and fix them. I'm not sure and don't care if this is due to ignorance on Conservapedia's part or Wikipedia's frequent process known as "updating," but I hope these are fixed. Unfortunately, every single point had flaws.
# Wikipedia actually has a full article about the murder of Jim Pouillon, even if it doesn't say it was at all motivated by political reasons.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jim_Pouillon]
# Wikipedia actually has a full article about the murder of Jim Pouillon, even if it doesn't say it was at all motivated by political reasons.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jim_Pouillon]
# "concluded that abortion does 'not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer.'" refers to the consensus of the biased scientific community as a whole. Their Lancet analysis is actually "meta-analysis of 53 epidemiologic studies of 83,000 women with breast cancer undertaken in 16 countries did not find evidence of a relationship between induced abortion and breast cancer, with a relative risk of 0.93 (0.89 – 0.96)." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-breast_cancer_hypothesis#Beral] In addition, the apostrophes in the quote do not exist.
# "concluded that abortion does 'not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer.'" refers to the consensus of the biased scientific community as a whole. Their Lancet analysis is actually "meta-analysis of 53 epidemiologic studies of 83,000 women with breast cancer undertaken in 16 countries did not find evidence of a relationship between induced abortion and breast cancer, with a relative risk of 0.93 (0.89 – 0.96)." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-breast_cancer_hypothesis#Beral] In addition, the apostrophes in the quote do not exist.