Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
few modifications
Line 27: Line 27:  
::Well, I think there isn't a dispute here.  So long as the blocking reasons are not cleansed for the deceitful reason of political correctness, all is good.  I didn't add half of the entries, so we need to try and remember it was other Admins who did....and the reason for the pull-down is to help make it easier, so we don't have to type repetitive entries, right?  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:33, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::Well, I think there isn't a dispute here.  So long as the blocking reasons are not cleansed for the deceitful reason of political correctness, all is good.  I didn't add half of the entries, so we need to try and remember it was other Admins who did....and the reason for the pull-down is to help make it easier, so we don't have to type repetitive entries, right?  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:33, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:::'''Afterthought:'''  The reasons many were added, we need to remember this, is because users were complaining they couldn't even discern why they were blocked, so it was decided by Andy to make the reasons clearer, more concise.  If we trim too many reasons, we are back where we were; obtuse generalities that little reflect the true blocking reasons.  I mean we could say for 75% of the blocks, "Violation of CP Commandments and/or Guidelines".....which gives little specificity, leaving the blocked user clueless as to the reason. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:::'''Afterthought:'''  The reasons many were added, we need to remember this, is because users were complaining they couldn't even discern why they were blocked, so it was decided by Andy to make the reasons clearer, more concise.  If we trim too many reasons, we are back where we were; obtuse generalities that little reflect the true blocking reasons.  I mean we could say for 75% of the blocks, "Violation of CP Commandments and/or Guidelines".....which gives little specificity, leaving the blocked user clueless as to the reason. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Simplifing==
 +
This page should be simplified to [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Ipbreason-dropdown&direction=prev&oldid=512439 this version], with perhaps a few modifications. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430

edits

Navigation menu