Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
20 bytes removed ,  12:44, April 6, 2007
Line 24: Line 24:  
== References that don't support the item they're referencing ==
 
== References that don't support the item they're referencing ==
   −
This article is a mess. Everything in it should have a citation. And the citation should be a published statement by someone authoritative—a recognized conservative is fine, but not "me and my brother"—that ''says the thing in question is liberal.''
+
Everything in it should have a citation.  
   −
What set me going is that there is a reference for Dan Rather's being considered liberal. But the reference does not say Dan Rather is liberal. It says Dan Rather things the New York Times is middle-of-the-road. There's a big difference between "X says Dan Rather is liberal" and "Dan Rather says Y is middle-of-the-road."
+
And the citation should be a published statement by someone authoritative—a recognized conservative is fine, but not "me and my brother"—that ''says the thing in question is liberal.''
 +
 
 +
What set me off is that there '''is''' a reference for Dan Rather's being considered liberal. But the reference does not say Dan Rather is liberal. It says Dan Rather things the New York Times is middle-of-the-road.  
 +
 
 +
There's a difference between "X says Dan Rather is liberal" and "Dan Rather says Y is middle-of-the-road."
    
Particularly when no source has been cited for the New York Times' supposed liberal bias. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:43, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Particularly when no source has been cited for the New York Times' supposed liberal bias. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:43, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
4,994

edits

Navigation menu