Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
suggestion
Line 32: Line 32:  
:*Violation of Commandments and/or CP Guidelines  
 
:*Violation of Commandments and/or CP Guidelines  
 
::This one is a good catch-all, but on the Blocking Policy page it would be too vague.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:43, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
 
::This one is a good catch-all, but on the Blocking Policy page it would be too vague.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:43, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
I think the list could be trimmed a bit; I would suggest starting with:
 +
:Common block reasons
 +
*Vandalism
 +
**Vandalism
 +
**Inserting false information
 +
**Removing content from pages
 +
**Spamming links to external sites
 +
**Inserting parody
 +
*User conduct
 +
**Intimidating behaviour/harassment
 +
**Abusing multiple accounts
 +
**Edit warring
 +
**Personal remarks
 +
*Username
 +
**Use your real first name and last initial
 +
**Inappropriate name
 +
*Other (describe in box below)
 +
**Violation of Commandments and/or CP Guidelines
 +
For full disclosure: I removed "Sock of blocked user" (very hard to prove, and really if they're abusing an account we should be able to block them for something else), inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages (seemed redundant, general vandalism covers that) and just made minor wording changes to others.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 12:33, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu