Changes

For many years I'm trying to publish in any scientific peer reviewed establishment journal (to avoid accusations of crankery) the news that according to physics of Einstein's general relativity the universe works slightly differently than scientific establishment assumes. The most important difference is that the so called "cosmological redshift" is not produced by expansion of universe but by an interesting effect of relativity of time, verifyiable with simple, almost Newtonian math, by any bright high shool student. This effect is time running slower in deep space than at (any) observer proportionally to exponent of ratio of the distance between observer and the point in deep space to so called "Einstein's redius of curvature of space". Equally important part of this effect is that it predicts Pioneer "anomaly" within one standard deviation about as it is observed <math>(7\times 10^{-10}m/s^2)</math>. I'm supplying here the paper that might support this bright high school student in his/her calculations of this effect that I call "[http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/160.htm Hubble time dilation]" and consider it being overlooked by all the Big Bang aficionados insisting on expansion of universe against better judgement of Einstein. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:44, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

For many years I'm trying to publish in any scientific peer reviewed establishment journal (to avoid accusations of crankery) the news that according to physics of Einstein's general relativity the universe works slightly differently than scientific establishment assumes. The most important difference is that the so called "cosmological redshift" is not produced by expansion of universe but by an interesting effect of relativity of time, verifyiable with simple, almost Newtonian math, by any bright high shool student. This effect is time running slower in deep space than at (any) observer proportionally to exponent of ratio of the distance between observer and the point in deep space to so called "Einstein's redius of curvature of space". Equally important part of this effect is that it predicts Pioneer "anomaly" within one standard deviation about as it is observed <math>(7\times 10^{-10}m/s^2)</math>. I'm supplying here the paper that might support this bright high school student in his/her calculations of this effect that I call "[http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/160.htm Hubble time dilation]" and consider it being overlooked by all the Big Bang aficionados insisting on expansion of universe against better judgement of Einstein. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:44, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

== Correcting the example #3 (Pioneer "anomaly") ==

Removing the duplicate (for some reason) massage...

 

For many years I'm trying to publish in any scientific peer reviewed establishment journal (to avoid accusations of crankery) the news that according to physics of Einstein's general relativity the universe works slightly differently than scientific establishment assumes. The most important difference is that the so called "cosmological redshift" is not produced by expansion of universe but by an interesting effect of relativity of time, verifyiable with simple, almost Newtonian math, by any bright high shool student. This effect is time running slower in deep space than at (any) observer proportionally to exponent of ratio of the distance between observer and the point in deep space to so called "Einstein's redius of curvature of space". Equally important part of this effect is that it predicts Pioneer "anomaly" within one standard deviation about as it is observed <math>(7\times 10^{-10}m/s^2)</math>. I'm supplying here the paper that might support this bright high school student in his/her calculations of this effect that I call "[http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/160.htm Hubble time dilation]" and consider it being overlooked by all the Big Bang aficionados insisting on expansion of universe against better judgement of Einstein. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT)