1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + +
Template talk:Controversial (view source)
Revision as of 23:28, July 17, 2011
, 23:28, July 17, 2011→Category:Conservapedia Administration
::Actually, we have. This template ''also'' adds articles to [[:Category:Controversial articles]], so that angle is covered. The template (and ONLY the template) is apparently supposed to go into the "CP Administration" category, so it should be "noinclude". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
::Actually, we have. This template ''also'' adds articles to [[:Category:Controversial articles]], so that angle is covered. The template (and ONLY the template) is apparently supposed to go into the "CP Administration" category, so it should be "noinclude". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Done. That Category is a mess; there are two large Categories, Template and Templates, that need to be merged, I think. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Done. That Category is a mess; there are two large Categories, Template and Templates, that need to be merged, I think. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
::::Hate to rain onto your parade, but now this template is also in the Controversial category. It will be fine if you just replace the line you just edited with <nowiki>"<noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude>"</nowiki>, trust me. That will cause this template to land in Administration and the articles in Controversial. Or just unlock the template for a few minutes.
::::Then we can muse whether to stuff from Administration to some other category. And yes, categorization seems to be a mess (though I didn't look deeper into it so far). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:28, 17 July 2011 (EDT)