183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + +
Debate: Should the United States defund the National Science Foundation? (view source)
Revision as of 12:36, July 18, 2011
, 12:36, July 18, 2011no edit summary
Magnets and gravity are so simple and so basic that a 5 year old could understand it (because I learned how they both work in *GASP* the evil public schools when I was 5). You don't understand how the scientific theory works and I'm not going to sit here and explain such a basic concept to a parodist. Or maybe you're not, you sound just like some of the sysops here. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 08:12, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
Magnets and gravity are so simple and so basic that a 5 year old could understand it (because I learned how they both work in *GASP* the evil public schools when I was 5). You don't understand how the scientific theory works and I'm not going to sit here and explain such a basic concept to a parodist. Or maybe you're not, you sound just like some of the sysops here. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 08:12, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
== NO ==
Of course, you'd save millions in the short-term, but how do you think the USA became the largest national economy in the world?
And to point out that science has discovered the answer to some questions, therefore it should be defunded is absolutely ludicrous and displays a complete ignorance of the scientific process. If you'd made the same argument 100 years ago you'd look like a bit of an idiot today with all the advances that have been made. [[User:WilliamB1|WilliamB1]] 08:36, 18 July 2011 (EDT)