SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: − **Use your real first name and last initial Line 55:
Line 54: +
MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown (view source)
Revision as of 02:47, July 19, 2011
, 02:47, July 19, 2011some specificity?
**Personal remarks
**Personal remarks
*Username
*Username
**Inappropriate name
**Inappropriate name
*Other (describe in box below)
*Other (describe in box below)
I genuinely think we should use my proposal above for the block rules - I think the first line of bullets exist for a reason, and my version makes use of them, I think and "other" option is important.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 20:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
I genuinely think we should use my proposal above for the block rules - I think the first line of bullets exist for a reason, and my version makes use of them, I think and "other" option is important.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 20:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:Ok, but it could be shortened. The user name items are redundant. A user name is either inappropriate or it's not, and we have no way of cheking (neither do we require they disclose to us) their real name. Parody, vandalism, false information (not mention violation of Commandments & guidelines) is redundant. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:16, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:Ok, but it could be shortened. The user name items are redundant. A user name is either inappropriate or it's not, and we have no way of cheking (neither do we require they disclose to us) their real name. Parody, vandalism, false information (not mention violation of Commandments & guidelines) is redundant. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:16, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::Above there was a debate that concluded that the items should be at least partially specific, so the user knows why he is blocked; technically we could use "violation of commandments/guidelines" as the ''only'' block reason, but that would probably leave at least a few blocked users clueless. Also - in the current version: "Inserting false information" and "Inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages" are both included even though "vandalism" is also included (I actually recommend taking the latter one out).--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:47, 18 July 2011 (EDT)