Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,742
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 52:
Line 52: − + + +
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 03:51, July 19, 2011
, 03:51, July 19, 2011→5 year blocks
:::Yes there may be a need to block a sock-plant that's been inactive and never used opver time, but I've seen too many usaer accounts blocked minutes after being created. It can be because someone isn't using checkuser properly, or there's just a controversy in the air an someone doesn't want to deal with questions avbout it. If good faith is expected of users, good faith should be exhibited by sysops by ''not'' being suspicious of every new acounbt registered. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:46, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Yes there may be a need to block a sock-plant that's been inactive and never used opver time, but I've seen too many usaer accounts blocked minutes after being created. It can be because someone isn't using checkuser properly, or there's just a controversy in the air an someone doesn't want to deal with questions avbout it. If good faith is expected of users, good faith should be exhibited by sysops by ''not'' being suspicious of every new acounbt registered. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:46, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked. ('''update''': and sockpuppets)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked. ('''update''': and sockpuppets)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::::The failue to use first name & last initial should not be a blockable offense,IMO; and the guidelines themselves say "encouraged" or "recommended". [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:51, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
== Infinite blocks ==
== Infinite blocks ==