Changes

::::::::Your second link seems to support my point: there still is not freedom of speech in England.  (I couldn't get your first link to work).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

::::::::Your second link seems to support my point: there still is not freedom of speech in England.  (I couldn't get your first link to work).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::Article 10 ''does'' guarantee freedom of speech and expression but the question is whether it is used and, anyway, it is some 300 years behind the US meaning that they haven't had any opportunity to exercise it like the US. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:37, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::Article 10 ''does'' guarantee freedom of speech and expression but the question is whether it is used and, anyway, it is some 300 years behind the US meaning that they haven't had any opportunity to exercise it like the US. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:37, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

Well, this article provides a rather nice summary; David Cameron [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006/may/12/immigrationpolicy.immigrationcalling for the repeal of the Human Rights Act]. If you would like anything more specific from me it will have to wait. It's 3.30am over here and I need my sleep. [[User:WilliamB1|WilliamB1]] 22:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

Well, this article provides a rather nice summary; David Cameron [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/28/conservatives-human-rights for the repeal of the Human Rights Act]. If you would like anything more specific from me it will have to wait. It's 3.30am over here and I need my sleep. [[User:WilliamB1|WilliamB1]] 22:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)

: Your link seems to be broken, unfortunately.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

: Your link seems to be broken, unfortunately.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

== Move Request ==

== Move Request ==