94
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Debate: Should the United States defund the National Science Foundation? (view source)
Revision as of 22:30, July 20, 2011
, 22:30, July 20, 2011no edit summary
Magnets and gravity are so simple and so basic that a 5 year old could understand it (because I learned how they both work in *GASP* the evil public schools when I was 5). You don't understand how the scientific theory works and I'm not going to sit here and explain such a basic concept to a parodist. Or maybe you're not, you sound just like some of the sysops here. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 08:12, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
Magnets and gravity are so simple and so basic that a 5 year old could understand it (because I learned how they both work in *GASP* the evil public schools when I was 5). You don't understand how the scientific theory works and I'm not going to sit here and explain such a basic concept to a parodist. Or maybe you're not, you sound just like some of the sysops here. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 08:12, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:I'd say this person is a parodist for sure. See:[[Magnetism]]. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:42, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:I'd say this person is a parodist for sure. See:[[Magnetism]]. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:42, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::Can we please stay on topic, Max? We're talking about the US wasting taxpayer money on scientific research. If research is truly that valuable, then private industry can pick up the slack. The NSF only funds about 20% of all science anyway. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 18:30, 20 July 2011 (EDT)
== NO ==
== NO ==