| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | * [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters | | * [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters |
| | * [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[animal migration|migration]] and [[homing]] | | * [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[animal migration|migration]] and [[homing]] |
| − | * [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]] | + | * [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]]. |
| | + | * Believing that only one ideology could ever make mistakes; constantly demonizing that ideology while ignoring the faults of ones own (a particulary [[Liberal]] fault). |
| | * [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity | | * [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity |
| | * [[Liberals]] who [[Bible denier|refuse to acknowledge]] the many fundamental truths in the [[Bible]] and even dismiss out-of-hand the many examples of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] but refuse to read the Bible. | | * [[Liberals]] who [[Bible denier|refuse to acknowledge]] the many fundamental truths in the [[Bible]] and even dismiss out-of-hand the many examples of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] but refuse to read the Bible. |
| Line 12: |
Line 13: |
| | * [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say. | | * [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say. |
| | * Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts. | | * Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts. |
| | + | * Believing sentimental fallacies about public figures even when all the objective facts clearly indicate that said fallacies are false. |
| | * [[Liberals]] who claim that the [[first amendment]] says that public officials are not allowed to acknowledge America's Christan heritage. | | * [[Liberals]] who claim that the [[first amendment]] says that public officials are not allowed to acknowledge America's Christan heritage. |
| | (add more) | | (add more) |