Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
752
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 464:
Line 464: + + + +
→Fiscal Convervatism vs. Social Conservatism: new section
Hey, just noticed that the article states the conservative party in Britain is currently in opposition, however this is not the case. I think the article is locked so I can't changed it myself so can an admin or otherwise please change it? [[User:RodgerW|RodgerW]] 15:42, 22 February 2011 (EST)
Hey, just noticed that the article states the conservative party in Britain is currently in opposition, however this is not the case. I think the article is locked so I can't changed it myself so can an admin or otherwise please change it? [[User:RodgerW|RodgerW]] 15:42, 22 February 2011 (EST)
: Ah, I see it has been fixed now, thanks whoever fixed it! [[User:RodgerW|RodgerW]] 16:50, 22 February 2011 (EST)
: Ah, I see it has been fixed now, thanks whoever fixed it! [[User:RodgerW|RodgerW]] 16:50, 22 February 2011 (EST)
== Fiscal Convervatism vs. Social Conservatism ==
While creating a link at the [[Gary Johnsnn]] article, I noticed this page has no differentiation between fiscal conservatism (ie low taxes, reducing or eliminating Social Security and Medicare, and cutting government spending) and social conservatism (ie outlawing abortion and same-sex marriage, allowing creationism in schools, etc.) While most Republican Party members fall into both categories and most Democrats fall into neither, many people (including the aforementioned Johnson and most libertarians) only fall into one. I'm not sure how to write an extensive section or two on this, but perhaps someone could. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:41, 24 July 2011 (EDT)