Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
288 bytes added ,  21:56, July 26, 2011
→‎Examples: two more examples
Line 7: Line 7:  
*[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]].
 
*[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]].
 
*Liberal [[nanny state|nanny statists]] argue that some acts are contrary to universally accepted standards and that if they are not prevented, everyone will want to do them.
 
*Liberal [[nanny state|nanny statists]] argue that some acts are contrary to universally accepted standards and that if they are not prevented, everyone will want to do them.
 +
*Liberals justify [[special rights]] as furthering [[equality]] and oppose genuine equality as a special right.
 +
*Liberals argue that the [[Equal Protection Clause]] was meant only to protect certain politically favored groups.  That interpretation defeats the whole point of that clause.
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
*[http://www.goodart.org/stolen.htm Stolen Concept]
 
*[http://www.goodart.org/stolen.htm Stolen Concept]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu