Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + + +
Talk:Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights? (view source)
Revision as of 13:26, August 1, 2011
, 13:26, August 1, 2011→This page is not being honest: new section
I think we should ignore votes by "contributors" that have not made any substantial mainspace edits. This goes for both sides. --[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 08:11, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I think we should ignore votes by "contributors" that have not made any substantial mainspace edits. This goes for both sides. --[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 08:11, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
== This page is not being honest ==
Yes, this page is not being honest. I am not against refinement of Conservapedia's rules and suggested a [[User:Conservative/blocking-board-framework|blocking review board framework]]. This is about RobS being disloyal to his fellow Conservapedians, not wanting to apply rules to himself and often behaving unreasonably. The dishonesty of this web page has probably caused Karajou and TerryH not to vote. Plus, Karajou believes sockpuppets are being used to vote and this page is a sham. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:26, 1 August 2011 (EDT)