SkipCaptcha
520
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: +
Talk:Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights? (view source)
Revision as of 02:24, August 2, 2011
, 02:24, August 2, 2011→the voters
I think we should ignore votes by "contributors" that have not made any substantial mainspace edits. This goes for both sides. --[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 08:11, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I think we should ignore votes by "contributors" that have not made any substantial mainspace edits. This goes for both sides. --[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 08:11, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:It would seem that some editors with blocking rights and a certain sysop are taking control of this by banning or blocking every remotely questionable user anyway. I would guess that at least half of the users in the nay will be blocked by the end of this.--[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 22:18, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:It would seem that some editors with blocking rights and a certain sysop are taking control of this by banning or blocking every remotely questionable user anyway. I would guess that at least half of the users in the nay will be blocked by the end of this.--[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 22:18, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::I think this is a serious issue. People on both sides of the vote have no real contributions and should not be given a say in Conservapedia's affairs.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:24, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
== This page is not being honest ==
== This page is not being honest ==