Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,253
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: + +
Talk:Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights? (view source)
Revision as of 02:44, August 2, 2011
, 02:44, August 2, 2011→Jcw edits
(unindent)Perhaps it's not a 'personal attack', but it is disrespectful of a senior admin on this site, of the site itself, and by implication the whole senior team here. You and I have no business making remarks like that. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 17:59, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
(unindent)Perhaps it's not a 'personal attack', but it is disrespectful of a senior admin on this site, of the site itself, and by implication the whole senior team here. You and I have no business making remarks like that. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 17:59, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:''You and I have no business making remarks like that.'' Which is part of the problem when it comes to sysop accountability and this is exactly why we have this page. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:04, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:''You and I have no business making remarks like that.'' Which is part of the problem when it comes to sysop accountability and this is exactly why we have this page. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:04, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::Would it be acceptable to fling insults if there was more sysop accountability, Max? If not, why should it be acceptable now? Jcw's completely correct, here. Those of us with basic block rights are simply trying to keep this reasonably civil. That means trying to weed out those who are creating accounts just to stir the pot, and it also means trying to keep criticisms constructive--they've been ranging into outright personal attacks way too often. Personal feelings don't enter into this; we're just trying to do our job. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:44, 1 August 2011 (EDT)