Changes

#No. He is a diligent and attentive administrator, as far as I am aware.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:13, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. He is a diligent and attentive administrator, as far as I am aware.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:13, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. RobS seems to be primarily promoting discussion about the Rules and Guidelines of this site and the accountability of administrators to those guidelines. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 09:08, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. RobS seems to be primarily promoting discussion about the Rules and Guidelines of this site and the accountability of administrators to those guidelines. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 09:08, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. This started out as a simple request from one admin to another for the latter to be more accommodating in the spirit of a wiki. user:Conservative has acted in a manner unbecoming of a sysop, dragging the debate across several pages, including - ironically - Mr. Schlafly's, whilst insisting that people cannot post on his talk page. If anybody deserves censure out of this, it is user:Conservative - he blows a simple request totally out of proportion, divides the sysop body and suddenly runs away - again! - claiming he is "very busy." Somebody this irresponsible sho--[[User:Rras|Robert Ras.]] 08:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)uld not be in a position of authority. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:12, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. This started out as a simple request from one admin to another for the latter to be more accommodating in the spirit of a wiki. user:Conservative has acted in a manner unbecoming of a sysop, dragging the debate across several pages, including - ironically - Mr. Schlafly's, whilst insisting that people cannot post on his talk page. If anybody deserves censure out of this, it is user:Conservative - he blows a simple request totally out of proportion, divides the sysop body and suddenly runs away - again! - claiming he is "very busy." Somebody this irresponsible should not be in a position of authority. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:12, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

#No. {{personal remark removed}}  User:RobS is correct in attempting to discipline him. {{unsigned|JanW}}

#No. {{personal remark removed}}  User:RobS is correct in attempting to discipline him. {{unsigned|JanW}}

#I don't think either should lose their sysop rights. I enjoy reading Conservatives satirical works, they often make me laugh. On the other hand I think Rob is right, I am new here but I get a little nervous when I see how many people are blocked. {{unsigned|John01}}

#I don't think either should lose their sysop rights. I enjoy reading Conservatives satirical works, they often make me laugh. On the other hand I think Rob is right, I am new here but I get a little nervous when I see how many people are blocked. {{unsigned|John01}}

#NAY! Conservative has been making a mockery of this website. Rob seems to be the only one able to see this and do something about it. Flying Kitties? FLYING KITTIES? --[[User:Rras|Robert Ras.]] 08:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

#NAY! Conservative has been making a mockery of this website. Rob seems to be the only one able to see this and do something about it. Flying Kitties? FLYING KITTIES? --[[User:Rras|Robert Ras.]] 08:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)