Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: + + + + + +
→Another suggestion as far as being on a faster track of becoming a Sysop: new section
:No I absolutely agree that the general tone of the debate is terrible (and the newer users instantly jumping it is also unsettling to me, so I share your resentment towards that kind of trolling). I've been trying to clean it up as well - and I applaud your effort; it's just that I have been, on occasion, been using [[Template:personal remark removed]] or reverting sysops, and I can't in good conscience say that TracyS's comment - while, again, I completely disagree from it - wasn't far more civil than content from higher-ups on both sides that I ''haven't'' reverted, but you're doing a great job.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 10:21, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:No I absolutely agree that the general tone of the debate is terrible (and the newer users instantly jumping it is also unsettling to me, so I share your resentment towards that kind of trolling). I've been trying to clean it up as well - and I applaud your effort; it's just that I have been, on occasion, been using [[Template:personal remark removed]] or reverting sysops, and I can't in good conscience say that TracyS's comment - while, again, I completely disagree from it - wasn't far more civil than content from higher-ups on both sides that I ''haven't'' reverted, but you're doing a great job.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 10:21, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::Thanks, I quite understand the position now. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:24, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::Thanks, I quite understand the position now. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:24, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
== Another suggestion as far as being on a faster track of becoming a Sysop ==
Another suggestion as far as being on a faster track of becoming a Sysop:
If you want to create a more collaborative spirit and increase the esprit de corps of Conservapedia, my suggestion at the present time is for a group of Conservapedians to pick a topic and then have editors create as many quality articles relating to that topic that are at least 500 words long. I would suggest that the articles not be stubs because that is not going to enhance the reputation of Conservapedia nor give it a sense of accomplishment. I created this project for a couple of editors who seemed interested in this topic: [[Conservapedia:Atheism Project]] I suggest creating a project with more widespread appeal because atheism is not on most people's radar in terms of the public at large - especially in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:54, 2 August 2011 (EDT)