15
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − #REDIRECT [[Talk:Essay: Penn Jillette, here is the evidence you claim you need to debate me]]+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Penn Jillette, here is the evidence you claim you need to debate me (view source)
Revision as of 03:07, August 3, 2011
, 03:07, August 3, 2011no edit summary
== Unfathomably Stupid ==
This page is unbelievable, even by the standards that we have come to expect from "Conservative". I have seen the little video clip from Mr. Jillette, in which he dismissed Conservapedia as a backwater web site, and dismissed "Conservative" as a nothing. The hubris (you can look it up) and arrogance of ''demanding'' that a known TV personality must debate you, under some deadline, is staggering. He has no intention of debating or otherwise engaging you. I'm surprised that he even posted a second video.
Since you like to demand that people debate you, try this on: I, user SamHB, demand that you debate me on the subject of the [[Generalized linear model]]. We won't bother with seconds; just you and me. You have until ... let's see, this is 1 day later than your demand of Mr. Jillette, so ... November 21, 2011. The usual format—written. You will show your erudition (see above) on this subject, and I will quiz you on same. By the way, in the article you never say how the ''generalized'' linear model differs from the plain linear model.
I know that you fancy yourself an expert on this subject, since you wrote the article, and even demanded that someone read about it while you and he were in some discussion of atheism or whatever. At that time, you seemed, in a number of edits, to be saying that you knew that the Generalized linear model held the key to proving that God exists. Or that theists are more charitable than atheists. Whatever. We have 4 months to refresh our memories on what your claims were. Then you can crunch the numbers for us.
You seem to be getting yourself awfully worked up over this issue. Now I know that being mocked by a famous show-business personality is rather degrading, but you brought this on yourself. And you continue to do so.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:39, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:SamHB, I have asked you to show me outstanding content that you have created which has gained a large following to show me how it is done and you have yet to do so. I think it is time you showed me how it's done. I don't expect this to happen though. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:43, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
::Sam, Conservative doesn't debate people who are willing to debate him. He only issues challenges to people who are highly unlikely to want to have anything to do with him. He has been challenged a number of times previously and has refused the challenges. He then goes off and writes articles about how other people are cowards for failing to debate their point of view. Allow me to demonstrate:
:::Oh, User:Conservative, I challenge you to debate me on your pet subject of atheism. Just you and me buddy. Mano-a-mano. Show the world that you have the machismo!
::You watch Sam. He will chicken out of this challenge just as he has chickened out of all of the previous challenges. He will then run off and write about how Richard Dawkins is a coward for not debating somee creationist or other. --[[User:CharlesDN|CharlesDN]] 23:07, 2 August 2011 (EDT)