166
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: +
Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights? (view source)
Revision as of 11:06, August 3, 2011
, 11:06, August 3, 2011no edit summary
#::'''Comment''' Does Karajou have any proof to show that people are just socking up? Let him run checkuser and weed them out. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 19:00, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
#::'''Comment''' Does Karajou have any proof to show that people are just socking up? Let him run checkuser and weed them out. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 19:00, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:::You're going to look at the list of blocks now, TerryB; I'm going after the socks and removing them, beginning with yours. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:46, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:::You're going to look at the list of blocks now, TerryB; I'm going after the socks and removing them, beginning with yours. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:46, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::::Thanks Karajou. I can only imagine how smug you must have been when you found that account. Please realize that more than one person can edit from the same IP. Eddie doesn't care he's been banned though, seeing how he never came back in the first place. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 07:06, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
::*Karajou can speak for himself. This is just more [[hearsay]] and [[innuendo]]. We're still waiting for User:Conservative to back up his claim 5 sysops support his scheme. Where are they? I count one. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:08, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::*Karajou can speak for himself. This is just more [[hearsay]] and [[innuendo]]. We're still waiting for User:Conservative to back up his claim 5 sysops support his scheme. Where are they? I count one. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:08, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
#Yea. User:RobSmith's plans will not be good for this website. [[User:Bclough|Bclough]] 16:10, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
#Yea. User:RobSmith's plans will not be good for this website. [[User:Bclough|Bclough]] 16:10, 31 July 2011 (EDT)