Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 204: Line 204:  
Still waiting on a response for this chart [http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_loy9sdR5Hj1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg here] which is based on data from the Congressional Budget Office and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Its significance is not partisan (who’s “to blame” for the deficit) but intellectual. It demonstrates the utter incoherence of being very concerned about a structural federal deficit but ruling out of consideration the policy that was largest single contributor to that deficit, namely the Bush-era tax cuts.
 
Still waiting on a response for this chart [http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_loy9sdR5Hj1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg here] which is based on data from the Congressional Budget Office and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Its significance is not partisan (who’s “to blame” for the deficit) but intellectual. It demonstrates the utter incoherence of being very concerned about a structural federal deficit but ruling out of consideration the policy that was largest single contributor to that deficit, namely the Bush-era tax cuts.
   −
Thanks
+
Thanks {{unsigned|Brittain}}
 +
 
 +
:That chart is cherry picked, rosy "projection" and is meaningless. But but but...? It is intellectually dishonest and can only be found on liberal websites. A  slightly older lefty chart promoting the same kind of bull [http://www.pensitoreview.com/Wordpress/wp-content/themes/mimbo2.2/images/graph-863k-jobs-created-09-101.jpg]. You'll notice the authentic "based on U.S. Labor Department statistics" as a ref.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 10:01, 4 August 2011 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu