Changes

* '''[[Conservapedia:Parody|Parody]]'''.  This is often easy to spot, but sometimes not.  Obvious cases involve altering an article in such a way as to make the article an object of ridicule.  It is sometimes done for ideological reasons, and sometimes for one's "15 minutes of fame"—there is an allure to the idea of typing something at one's computer that the whole world will see, an allure that sometimes affects people totally lacking in common sense.  Vandalism and parody are problems for all wikis.  Clear parody is treated the same as vandalism.  Other cases are harder to judge, and may require serious editorial intervention.

* '''[[Conservapedia:Parody|Parody]]'''.  This is often easy to spot, but sometimes not.  Obvious cases involve altering an article in such a way as to make the article an object of ridicule.  It is sometimes done for ideological reasons, and sometimes for one's "15 minutes of fame"—there is an allure to the idea of typing something at one's computer that the whole world will see, an allure that sometimes affects people totally lacking in common sense.  Vandalism and parody are problems for all wikis.  Clear parody is treated the same as vandalism.  Other cases are harder to judge, and may require serious editorial intervention.

* '''[[Edit war]]ring'''.  When people disagree on content, they should try to work out their differences on the talk page.  Just reverting each other's changes repeatedly does no good, and can lead to a temporary block if it distracts people from doing real work.

* '''[[Edit war]]ring'''.  When people disagree on content, they should try to work out their differences on the talk page.  Just reverting each other's changes repeatedly does no good, and can lead to a temporary block if it distracts people from doing real work.

* Personal remarks.  We do not look kindly on personal insults directed at other contributors.  You should be able to disagree on content without being personally insulting.

* '''[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility|Incivility]]'''.  We do not look kindly on personal insults directed at other contributors.  You should be able to disagree on content without being personally insulting.

* Intimidating behaviour/harassment.  Personal remarks can sometime get very serious.  When they do, the consequences can also get serious.

* Intimidating behaviour/harassment.  Personal remarks can sometime get very serious.  When they do, the consequences can also get serious.

* Removing content from article pages without discussion.  We take a dim view of the plain removal of information; it smacks of censorship. Try to find a way of incorporating the other person's viewpoint into the article.  When necessary, discuss on the talk page.

* Removing content from article pages without discussion.  We take a dim view of the plain removal of information; it smacks of censorship. Try to find a way of incorporating the other person's viewpoint into the article.  When necessary, discuss on the talk page.