SkipCaptcha
1,125
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: +
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 04:04, August 5, 2011
, 04:04, August 5, 2011→Intro
==Intro==
==Intro==
Under this definition, [[Liberal censorship]] and [[trolling]] are virtually the same things. It is the site owner's intention to make the view expressed in the mainspace article on liberal censorship the core of CP's blocking policy. Liberal censorship, it appears, applies both to article mainspace and discussion pages. Although Conservapedia does not block on ideological grounds, nor is an ideological litmus required for active users, it is ultimately the behavior of the user that is judged in issuing blocks. Redundant arguments for the liberal point of view, or mainspace contributions that run counter to a conservative, Christian, family-friendly educational resource, is trolling. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:02, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
Under this definition, [[Liberal censorship]] and [[trolling]] are virtually the same things. It is the site owner's intention to make the view expressed in the mainspace article on liberal censorship the core of CP's blocking policy. Liberal censorship, it appears, applies both to article mainspace and discussion pages. Although Conservapedia does not block on ideological grounds, nor is an ideological litmus required for active users, it is ultimately the behavior of the user that is judged in issuing blocks. Redundant arguments for the liberal point of view, or mainspace contributions that run counter to a conservative, Christian, family-friendly educational resource, is trolling. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:02, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
:It is a bit of a slippery slope because I might make raise arguments about a pages contents and be blocked for trolling under the "arguments for the liberal point of view". The 9/10 rule should be used as opposed to trolling. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:04, 5 August 2011 (EDT)