Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,426
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 12:
Line 12: +
Conservapedia talk:Writing plan (view source)
Revision as of 18:54, August 6, 2011
, 18:54, August 6, 2011→Examples?
I think it would be helpful if this page linked to some examples of well-received writing plans, to give some guidance as to the expectations. Do any such examples exist? -- I don't think in my time at CP I ever saw anyone actually submit a writing plan, they tended to just get banned. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 13:59, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
I think it would be helpful if this page linked to some examples of well-received writing plans, to give some guidance as to the expectations. Do any such examples exist? -- I don't think in my time at CP I ever saw anyone actually submit a writing plan, they tended to just get banned. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 13:59, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
:It's similiar to 90/10; the idea is to cut down discussion and get an editor focued on mainspace contribs. Ed is the only sysop I've ever seen do this [http://cp.noym.net/1221d0ffdd3dc93f], but sysops do not have the power to issue instructions to editors anymore. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
:It's similiar to 90/10; the idea is to cut down discussion and get an editor focued on mainspace contribs. Ed is the only sysop I've ever seen do this [http://cp.noym.net/1221d0ffdd3dc93f], but sysops do not have the power to issue instructions to editors anymore. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Let me be clear on this, it appears a recent block was ''for'' failure to follow instructions to submit a writing plan, whereas the idea is supposed to be submit a writing plan to get unblocked, I think. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)