Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 366: Line 366:     
A sad part of this story is that Einstein was right in his assumption that the universe is stationary (non expanding) and his critics supporting LeMaitre wrong but Einstein gave up arguing with [http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/3268.htm#fo idiots] to be able to work peacefully on other projects. And now we have a lame hypothesis of ''Big Bang'' which is physically impossible (for its creation of energy from nothing), and scientific establishment who refuses for years to peer review papers supporting Einstein's original idea accidentally turning out right. As Einstein told a journalist asking how to make a discovery: ''"Very simple, when all the wise men decide that something can't be calculated, comes an ignorant who does not know it, and calculates it."'' What just happened in my case, but I might gladly show my calculations to any intelligent high school student to prove that he or she can make them too, despite that all the wise men couldn't. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 15:53, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
 
A sad part of this story is that Einstein was right in his assumption that the universe is stationary (non expanding) and his critics supporting LeMaitre wrong but Einstein gave up arguing with [http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/3268.htm#fo idiots] to be able to work peacefully on other projects. And now we have a lame hypothesis of ''Big Bang'' which is physically impossible (for its creation of energy from nothing), and scientific establishment who refuses for years to peer review papers supporting Einstein's original idea accidentally turning out right. As Einstein told a journalist asking how to make a discovery: ''"Very simple, when all the wise men decide that something can't be calculated, comes an ignorant who does not know it, and calculates it."'' What just happened in my case, but I might gladly show my calculations to any intelligent high school student to prove that he or she can make them too, despite that all the wise men couldn't. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 15:53, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Correcting example #1 <math>(G_{\mu\nu} = 8 \pi K T_{\mu\nu})</math> ==
 +
Contrary to the above equation, the original Einsteinian equation was <math>R_{\mu\nu} = 8 \pi T_{\mu\nu}</math>, where <math>R_{\mu\nu}</math> is ''"[[Ricci tensor]]"'' and <math>T_{\mu\nu}</math> is ''"[[Stress-energy tensor]]"'', which is much simpler and does not contain <math>G_{\mu\nu}</math> that was introduced by authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' to suggest the need for expansion of the universe but turned out to be not necessary when ''"[[Hubble Time Dilation]]"'' (HTD) entered the picture in 1985 and explained the redshift in stationary ''"[[Einstein's universe]]"'' <ref>See ''"[[Einsteinian universe]]"''.</ref>.
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu