24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68:
Line 68: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing? (view source)
Revision as of 15:40, August 8, 2011
, 15:40, August 8, 2011no edit summary
::Maybe if people would attempt to read any of the Humanist Manifestos floating around they could possibly understand the direct correlation between Humanism and evolutionary theory. Perhaps it is because they are too cold to care and just say bah, Judeo-Christians! Easier just to accuse others of having a personal problem with an idea then to use any critical thinking on the subject. Here's a clue to it: Humanism rejects the spiritual realm as denoted by their manifesto and so does the 150+ year old theory of evolution.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 13:47, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
::Maybe if people would attempt to read any of the Humanist Manifestos floating around they could possibly understand the direct correlation between Humanism and evolutionary theory. Perhaps it is because they are too cold to care and just say bah, Judeo-Christians! Easier just to accuse others of having a personal problem with an idea then to use any critical thinking on the subject. Here's a clue to it: Humanism rejects the spiritual realm as denoted by their manifesto and so does the 150+ year old theory of evolution.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 13:47, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
::FOOTNOTES- Humanist Manifestos I,II,2000,Amsterdam Declaration. All are available for reading through any search engine.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 13:52, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
::FOOTNOTES- Humanist Manifestos I,II,2000,Amsterdam Declaration. All are available for reading through any search engine.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 13:52, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
==Scientific Consensus==
99% of biologists believe that evolution created modern speciation.
All science is sent through rigorous peer-review which would throw out nonsense and help develop theories further.
It's been 200 years, and even then dozens of scientists were preparing to publish their findings on it (not just Darwin!).
There is no other concept (except Creationism) for how speciation happened.
:Creationism can only be derived by
::observing animals pop into existence (which is done in the Bible, and no where else, and isn't a verified or peer-reviewed text)
::Seeing the evolution is impossible (Genetic Algorithms show the opposite of this)
There is no data which contradicts the theory of evolution that is even sound (let alone convincing).
It is "almost sure" that evolution is how we obtained modern speciation.
[[User:Valuables|Valuables]] 11:40, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
==Many Authoritative Sounding Assertions Does Not Make For A Conclusive Debate==
==Many Authoritative Sounding Assertions Does Not Make For A Conclusive Debate==