24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 534:
Line 534: + + + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 15:44, August 8, 2011
, 15:44, August 8, 2011no edit summary
:: Note also that the main creationist groups do not support teachers being forced to teach creation and ID, although they do support teachers being ''allowed'' to teach it.
:: Note also that the main creationist groups do not support teachers being forced to teach creation and ID, although they do support teachers being ''allowed'' to teach it.
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:41, 12 February 2009 (EST)
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:41, 12 February 2009 (EST)
==IT'S NOT SCIENCE==
Several large court cases had the proponents of ID state that '''ID is not science!'''
ID has virtually no scientific papers up for peer review
To qualify ID as science, you'd also be qualifying Astrology as science.
Teach it in Philosophy / World History (when discussing Christianity)- NOT science class, where there is no science behind it!
[[User:Valuables|Valuables]] 11:44, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
==No!==
==No!==