24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 139:
Line 139: + + +
no edit summary
"announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution."
"announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution."
:They fail to point out that they represent probably less than 0.1% of all scientists, and that a single scientific forum could have more members..? So why are they using this in the article?
:They fail to point out that they represent probably less than 0.1% of all scientists, and that a single scientific forum could have more members..? So why are they using this in the article?
Rather than provide actual data, this article quotes a few scientists who have made points which support the views of the article.
There is no cited information which shows the opinions expressed are universally correct;
more of the article is spent disproving evolution than explaining it (which is barely done at all).