Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎A point of view on this article: The counterexamples are well-supported by citations or obvious logic. The internet is popular for learning because books have limitations of being outdated ...
Line 417: Line 417:     
::::Andy, you have not answered, and we're talking about Relativity, not Evolution... '''Why''' do you say that these counterexamples are true? How have you verified these statements? Did some physics professor, or more generally, a relativity expert, told you? Are they written on some physics book? (I doubt it) --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 20:33, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Andy, you have not answered, and we're talking about Relativity, not Evolution... '''Why''' do you say that these counterexamples are true? How have you verified these statements? Did some physics professor, or more generally, a relativity expert, told you? Are they written on some physics book? (I doubt it) --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 20:33, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::The counterexamples are well-supported by citations or obvious logic.  The internet is popular for learning because books have limitations of being outdated and subject to biased censorship.  If you want to limit learning to what is written in books, rather than using logic as well as the most recently available information, then why are you even discussing science on the internet?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:39, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu