Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 435:
Line 435: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 00:12, August 10, 2011
, 00:12, August 10, 2011→A point of view on this article: Contrast that with real physical insights, like quantum mechanics, which have produced tremendous progress.
:Since Schlafly is not responding, I'm asking to every other user: why this page is still unedited? I remember to you all the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|first commandment]] (and the laughs that this page causes all over the world :D). I don't want to edit the page without the consense of other users (Schlafly ''in primis''), so I think I'll wait... --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 16:40, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
:Since Schlafly is not responding, I'm asking to every other user: why this page is still unedited? I remember to you all the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|first commandment]] (and the laughs that this page causes all over the world :D). I don't want to edit the page without the consense of other users (Schlafly ''in primis''), so I think I'll wait... --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 16:40, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
:: The entry is supported by citations and logic. To take your highest-ranking criticism (point 16), the fact is that the [[theory of relativity]] has yielded nothing of value. Contrast that with real physical insights, like [[quantum mechanics]], which have produced tremendous progress.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:12, 9 August 2011 (EDT)