Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 438: Line 438:  
:: The entry is supported by citations and logic.  To take your highest-ranking criticism (point 16), the fact is that the [[theory of relativity]] has yielded nothing of value.  Contrast that with real physical insights, like [[quantum mechanics]], which have produced tremendous progress.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:12, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:: The entry is supported by citations and logic.  To take your highest-ranking criticism (point 16), the fact is that the [[theory of relativity]] has yielded nothing of value.  Contrast that with real physical insights, like [[quantum mechanics]], which have produced tremendous progress.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:12, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
   −
::: This is you opinion, not the opinion expressed, for example [http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2008/410156/ here], ["Relativity in the future of engineering" here], [http://www.springer.com/physics/particle+and+nuclear+physics/book/978-3-540-20623-1?cm_mmc=Google-_-Book%20Search-_-Springer-_-0 here] (do you think lasers are useless?) or [http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/8/10/247 here] (the mathematical tools of general relativity used to understand metamaterials... some times ago I attended a conference in which explained why the electrons in graphene could be well described with general relativity-like formulas).
+
::: This is you opinion, not the opinion expressed, for example [http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2008/410156/ here], [http://scholar.google.it/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Relativity+in+the+future+of+engineering%22&btnG=Cerca&lr=&as_sdt=0 here], [http://www.springer.com/physics/particle+and+nuclear+physics/book/978-3-540-20623-1?cm_mmc=Google-_-Book%20Search-_-Springer-_-0 here] (do you think lasers are useless?) or [http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/8/10/247 here] (the mathematical tools of general relativity used to understand metamaterials... some times ago I attended a conference in which explained why the electrons in graphene could be well described with general relativity-like formulas).
 
::: So, do not repeat "citations and logic" again and answer these easy questions: do you think that p<sup>µ</sup>+q<sup>µ</sup> is the null vector or not? (It's math easily handled easily even by children...) And the most important question: do you think that the speed of light is a constant or not? --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 07:50, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::: So, do not repeat "citations and logic" again and answer these easy questions: do you think that p<sup>µ</sup>+q<sup>µ</sup> is the null vector or not? (It's math easily handled easily even by children...) And the most important question: do you think that the speed of light is a constant or not? --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 07:50, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
79

edits

Navigation menu