Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:  
What part of his career is there to discuss?  He was an officer from more or less the midway point of WWI and kept getting promoted until he was made "Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Forces in Europe" culminating in the organisation and leading of D Day.  He then became NATO supreme commander in Europe from 1951 until he ran for president in 1954.  And that's just the highlights!  I understand that Ike is not popular on this site, but lets not pretend that he didn't have a significant pre politics career.  The very reason he won two landslide elections was because of his pre-politics career.  Unless someone can give a coherent argument to the contrary, I will move him up to the top section.  (And I don't think it can be argued he didn't have influence - his role in ending the Korean war, his moderating the demands of the Taft led senate all point to a significant influence, for good or bad).  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:03, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
 
What part of his career is there to discuss?  He was an officer from more or less the midway point of WWI and kept getting promoted until he was made "Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Forces in Europe" culminating in the organisation and leading of D Day.  He then became NATO supreme commander in Europe from 1951 until he ran for president in 1954.  And that's just the highlights!  I understand that Ike is not popular on this site, but lets not pretend that he didn't have a significant pre politics career.  The very reason he won two landslide elections was because of his pre-politics career.  Unless someone can give a coherent argument to the contrary, I will move him up to the top section.  (And I don't think it can be argued he didn't have influence - his role in ending the Korean war, his moderating the demands of the Taft led senate all point to a significant influence, for good or bad).  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:03, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Without objection; it is so moved.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:07, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Without objection; it is so moved.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:07, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== RE: John Major ==
 +
 +
John Major was downgraded, and described as inept and obscure. I'd like to make a couple of points. John Major left school at 16, with only 3 O-levels. But he studied hard by correspondence course, and taught himself three more: 'British Constitution,' 'Economics,' 'Mathematics.' He helped with his father's small, failing business, and worked as a clerk. His father died, and that year, he joined the Young Conservatives, got a job with the London Electricity Board (and studied banking by correspondence while working a full time job). He became a banker with Standard Chartered Bank and became a senior executive who traveled across Africa for them. He famously began making speeches about economic conservative principles, standing on a box, at his local market, and became a Conservative Member of Parliament. He went on to be Chancellor of the Exchequer under Thatcher, and succeeded her as Prime Minister.
 +
 +
To me, somebody who didn't do very well at school, but worked very hard to better himself, and became a senior banking executive (remember that getting into such jobs without Oxford/Cambridge education or family connections is very difficult), then became the director of economic policy under THATCHER and then went onto be Prime Minister is a veritable conservative legend, who indeed had a solid career. He could, certainly, have earned more as a banking executive than as a politician.
 +
 +
Now, let's talk about influence. If directing economic policy under Thatcher isn't influence enough, lets talk about other things. He famously convinced George Bush Sr to support no fly zones in the Gulf War. If convincing the American President of something isn't influence, what is? In 1992, with Major as Leader, the conservative party gained more votes than any other British political party has ever gained in an election. More than Thatcher or Churchill ever gained! Major's Back to Basics campaign emphasized the family values which sadly were absent from the last few years of Thatcher's administration. John major did as much to solve the Northern Ireland problems as anybody else: And lets remember, that's one of the most successful cases of defeating terrorism ever. [[User:AlycaZ|AlycaZ]] 23:32, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
89

edits

Navigation menu