94
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + + + +
Talk:Grand Canyon National Park (view source)
Revision as of 15:42, August 11, 2011
, 15:42, August 11, 2011→What?: new section
:::::::I think you better read ''again'' what I said above. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:27, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
:::::::I think you better read ''again'' what I said above. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:27, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
::::::::I have, and I'm not trolling or anything, but I honestly can't imagine how the flood would carve the Grand Canyon and create all the observed phenomena (stratified rock, U-turns, sheer cliff faces, etc). Maybe there should be a section in the article about how the Grand Canyon was formed? Because I don't think I've read about the exact process from a creationist viewpoint before, and creationists do bring the Grand Canyon up a lot, so, I think it would be important. [[User:Aurix|Aurix]] 08:34, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
::::::::I have, and I'm not trolling or anything, but I honestly can't imagine how the flood would carve the Grand Canyon and create all the observed phenomena (stratified rock, U-turns, sheer cliff faces, etc). Maybe there should be a section in the article about how the Grand Canyon was formed? Because I don't think I've read about the exact process from a creationist viewpoint before, and creationists do bring the Grand Canyon up a lot, so, I think it would be important. [[User:Aurix|Aurix]] 08:34, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
== What? ==
The theory of creationism doesn't necessarily ride on the great flood creating the Grand Canyon and other geographical features. Why harm your credibility by making such ludicrous claims? Do you realize the amount of force that would be required to form the Grand Canyon all at once?--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 11:42, 11 August 2011 (EDT)