94
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: +
Talk:Grand Canyon National Park (view source)
Revision as of 00:02, August 12, 2011
, 00:02, August 12, 2011→What?
::And do you realize how unstable the Grand Canyon would be if it happened all at once like this article claims? And the area around it? All of the evidence points to a gradual formation due to erosion. The only evidence this article uses to support its theory seem to be the questions of somebody who doesn't know very much about the subject. No hard data. Just questions. Again, why harm the credibility of creationism by making these claims?--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 15:36, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
::And do you realize how unstable the Grand Canyon would be if it happened all at once like this article claims? And the area around it? All of the evidence points to a gradual formation due to erosion. The only evidence this article uses to support its theory seem to be the questions of somebody who doesn't know very much about the subject. No hard data. Just questions. Again, why harm the credibility of creationism by making these claims?--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 15:36, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Going by what the Bible says hardly hurts the claims of creationists. It only strengthens them. [[User:JohnMcL|JohnMcL]] 15:40, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Going by what the Bible says hardly hurts the claims of creationists. It only strengthens them. [[User:JohnMcL|JohnMcL]] 15:40, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
::::The Bible says that the flood formed the Grand Canyon? Where? Even if it does though, if it were true there would be evidence of it, which there isn't. So if it really does say that i guess it hurts the Bible's credibility--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 20:02, 11 August 2011 (EDT)