SkipCaptcha
3,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + +
→Talk page edits: new section
As regard [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]], pro-homosexual polemics, in all their prolixity, are spurious, and they ultimately require the use of a hermeneutic which would negate any moral law, or negating the authority of the Bible.
As regard [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]], pro-homosexual polemics, in all their prolixity, are spurious, and they ultimately require the use of a hermeneutic which would negate any moral law, or negating the authority of the Bible.
An extensive examination and refutation of such attempts can be seen here: [http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS and the BIBLE][[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 15:48, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
An extensive examination and refutation of such attempts can be seen here: [http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS and the BIBLE][[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 15:48, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
== Talk page edits ==
Jab, all of your edits have been to talk pages. I'm not sure if you were aware, but Conservapedia has a 90/10 rule in which you are not supposed to make 90% talk edits and few contributions. I would advise that you create some content, or you may be blocked. If you need any help or suggestions, feel free to ask me! Just a friendly advisement. Thanks. See [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]].--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 20:31, 11 August 2011 (EDT)